Ron Jeremy and pepper spray? TMZ got the story wrong, he says.
December 28, 2008
This past week, gossip site TMZ reported that porn granddaddy Ron Jeremy casually ate his dinner at Mel’s Diner on the Sunset Strip after a paparazzo attempted to snap pictures and then pepper sprayed a companion of Ron’s who objected to the photos.
In TMZ’s report, photographer Nasim Saleh began taking the pictures when a friend stood up to stop him and the spraying ensued. Saleh stated he was only acting in self-defense and was arrested for criminal use of tear gas. TMZ further reported that Saleh had told authorities that he was a photographer for TMZ, which they denied.
However, Jeremy has stated that TMZ got the facts of the story wrong. He states that he and Dennis Hof, owner of the Moonlight Bunny Ranch, were inside eating and didn’t even know what was happening outside. Jeremy said in an interview with Adult Video News:
“[Saleh] sent someone into the diner to ask if we’d do interviews and we said, ‘No problem! We’d be glad to when we get out. So someone was rude to the guy and said, ‘Get lost, they don’t want to bother with you.’ We never said that. Someone just thought that we didn’t want to get bothered. This is not Lindsey Lohan or Britney Spears. We like attention.”
Jeremy also stated that Saleh may have been acting in self-defense as witnesses claim that someone attempting to shoo him from the premises did so while threatening him with a knife.
The biggest laughs, however, came from Jeremy when he read the “punchline” of TMZ’s story, “….we’re told during the incident, Ron Jeremy just kept eating.”
Jeremy, however, gloated over the gaff and even found it humorous that Hof didn’t even rate a mention in the article:
“Six seasons of HBO’s ‘Cathouse’ and they didn’t even put Dennis Hof’s name in there — he didn’t even exist. It was Ron Jeremy and a pastrami sandwich, not Dennis and his bowl of soup. So I want to rub that in his face every chance I get. It bothered him; he didn’t act like it did, but it did.”
Don’t worry Hof….the world knows now….
Japanese adult video theatre fire kills 15
December 20, 2008
Wednesday, a man set fire to a Japanese adult video theatre in a failed suicide attempt and killed 15 others. He was arrested and confessed to setting the fire with a bag of newspapers. Public broadcaster NHK reported that the man stated he committed the crime because he was “tired of living.”
The Cats Adult Video Theater was located on the ground floor of a seven-story building in Osaka’s entertainment district. When the fire started, most of the 32 viewing cubicles — equipped with a television, DVD player, and cot — wer occupied. Not all of the cubicles were being used to view adult films, however. Occasionally businessmen would use the rooms if they missed the last train home and many who could not afford proper housing use them live in these types of lounges. This particular theater also offered DVD cartoons and Hollywood films for those not wishing to view porn.
Japan’s Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism has instructed fire departments to conduct nationwide emergency inspections of all video shops, Internet cafes, karaoke bars, and other facilities that utilize individual cubicles.
Know where the key is when handcuffing your partner!
December 20, 2008
The Detroit Free Press reported that Thursday a Dearborn, Michigan man called the police to his house to borrow a key. Apparently, he had misplaced his and was unable to free his wife who had been handcuffed to the bed.
Fortunately, the universal key carried by police officers did the trick. The police say that it was a consensual and intimate relationship, not an imprisonment, so no charges should be filed. Besides, I figure the publicity will either help him remember to keep it close by or cause his wife to never want to do that again.
Proper planning prevents poor performance — so keep your keys within reach!
Sneezing linked to sex?
December 20, 2008
Friday, the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine published a paper by Mahmood Bhutta and Harold Maxwell citing the case of a man who suffered sneezing fits whenever he thought about sex. Seeing this as an interesting phenomenon, the researchers entered anonymous Internet chat rooms and were told by 17 people, of both sexes, that they either sneezed when thinking about sex or after achieving orgasm.
Bhutta is an ear-nose-throat specialist and said that this could be an inherited trait and can be more widespread than others first thought. I want to see the genetic study that shows which gene is responsible for sex sneezes!
When discussing his findings, Bhutta said:
It certainly seems odd, but I think this reflex demonstrates evolutionary relics in the wiring of a part of the nervous system called the autonomic nervous system…. This is the part beyond our control, and which controls things like our heart rate and the amount of light let in by our pupils. Sometimes the signals in this system get crossed, and I think this may be why some people sneeze when they think about sex.
Reportedly, there are only two other references to sneezing and sex in medical journals. Bhutta believes that embarrassment could be the reason this phenomenon isn’t being researched further.
If you suffer from this, don’t be afraid to say something! It’s more common than you think and might provide invaluable insight into how sex and other bodily functions relate. I can’t wait to read more!
Crystal Gunns resigns from school post over scandal
December 14, 2008
Louisa C. Tuck, also known as former porn star Crystal Gunns, has decided to hang up her cafeteria apron and leave the New Jersey school district where she had worked since June 2008. In a one-sentence resignation, she stated she was “resigning in good standing” effective December 8.
Vineland Public Schools Superintendent Charles D. Ottinger stated that the school district did not wish for nor requested the resignation from Ms. Tuck. The resignation letter did not give any hints as to whether or not the recent publicity had played any part in her decision. Vineland YMCA Executive Director and CEO George Steinbronn stated that Ms. Tuck is still employed as a supervisor for children’s programs.
Ms. Tuck’s resignation, however, has not been approved by the school board and she can rescind it at any time before the next meeting, scheduled for January 21. Ottinger stated that the board would most likey allow her to keep her job if she changes her mind because they did not request the resignation.
So, once again the parents who feel they must shelter their little darlings from the non-existent evils of the world (see my previous blog) have caused someone who has done nothing wrong to leave. Ms. Tuck has not received poor reviews, nor has her previous career caused a problem except in the eyes of these over-protective, knee-jerk parents. I personally hope that Ms. Tuck reconsiders her decision, but I can also completely agree if she doesn’t. It is hard to live and work in an area where the moral majority dictates who is and who isn’t acceptable in society.
Captain Jack Sparrow in brig over flashing women?
December 14, 2008
So much for Disneyland being the “Happiest place on earth” — especially for four actors fired in a scandal over women flashing their breasts.
Disneyland officials state that the firings were due to a drop in popularity of the character and not the reported throngs of women flashing their breasts at the actors. Captain Jack Sparrow was often found posing for pictures on “Tom Sawyer Island” but more likely could be located in the “New Orleans Square” near the “Pirates of the Caribbean” ride. Some seemed to believe that women would just naturally flash themselves at the character made popular by Johnny Depp since they were on “Bourbon Street.” The move from “New Orleans” to “Tom Sawyer Island” was made in response to the rumors and officials state that since visitors could not find the character, that wa the reason for the drop in popularity.
However, even the fired actors state that no such things happened or were what led to the firings. It is questionable to remove one of the largest and most popular characters in favor of adding new fairy actresses to promote Disney’s latest movie, “Tinkerbell.”
Many male friends state that when they have dressed in the Jack Sparrow costumes they have most often been the center of attention from women at the gatherings — some inebriated and some not. Perhaps the thought of being with the bad-boy of the seas is thrilling enough for them to forego modesty in a children-targeted amusement park. However, I’m pretty sure Disney will soon return Captain Jack to the line-up as the returns from “Tinkerbell” wane.
Rubber breasts missing at sea
December 7, 2008
It was reported earlier this week that 130,000 inflatable rubber breasts have washed out to sea in Australia. They were to be distributed with the January issues of Ralph, a men’s magazine.
The cargo is estimated to be worth about $200,000(AU). The parent company of the publisher is already $4.3(AU) in debt. This tragedy no doubt doesn’t help keep their business afloat. A spokeswoman stated that the boxes left Beijing two weeks ago but turned up empty in Sydney upon arrival.
The publishers have put out an all-points bulletin on the breasts and reports that if they’re not found within the next two weeks it will be too late for the scheduled issue. The magazine’s editor has asked if anyone finds them washed up on shore to please let them know.
String him up! Babysitter uses child in porn film.
December 5, 2008
This is almost too disgusting for words!! A Minnesota man has pleaded guilty to using a child in a porn film after answering an online ad for babysitting services.
Aaron J. Lemon admitted this past Wednesday to producing the video. Police state that this scumbag used Craigslist to answer a legitimate ad requesting a babysitter and coerced a 2-year-old girl into explicit acts. He faces a maximum of 30 years in prison.
That’s all?? A predator like this faces only up to 30 years??
This is part of what really, really disgusts me about people. This man explicity used an online resource to seek out a victim who couldn’t possibly begin to give any type of consent, much less the fact that it’s completely illegal! Not to mention absolutely disgusting. Many predators try to excuse their actions because they say the victim “told them it was okay” and understood what was happening or they “wanted it to happen.” But to seek out a 2-year-old???
String him up! And you can guess which part I’d like the rope around…. Our children need to be protected from perverts like this. Many, many thanks go out to the police and U.S. Attorney’s office who stated that Lemon was caught through a project that encourages agencies to investigate sexual exploitation of children over the Internet.
This is a time where my usual rant of parental responsibility and ensuring your children are safe isn’t warranted. The parents hired a babysitter on the premise that he was going to actually do his job, not molest their child. Maybe they could have requested more references and/or background checks. And maybe they did and this guy passed them all. The bottom line is he sought-out his victim. He is the one who filmed it. And he is the one responsible for all of this. We need more people making sure these sickos don’t harm any more kids.
Update & Opinion – School drops Crystal Gunns case
December 3, 2008
You’ve probably already read my blog entry about Louisa C. Tuck (aka Crystal Gunns) and the school district that had planned to fire her. If you haven’t read it, go back there and get caught up on the story!!
Now the district has decided to drop the case. The question of the day is this – who ratted her out?
Charles D. Ottinger, Superintendent of Schools at Vineland School District, states:
Neither the Vineland Board of Education nor the Vineland Public School District initiated the investigation into Louisa Tuck. We started our investigation after a reporter for The Daily Journal contacted our board president.
In an article by AdultFYI.com, the statement by Mr. Ottinger includes concerns for the students and their families but does not denigrate Ms. Tuck for her previous employment. He also states that he understands how many students are exposed to various items of questionable nature on a daily basis.
It is admirable how Mr. Ottinger believes the school district should help be the “moral compass” for the students. But, this is obviously a man with his head on straight and a firm grip on reality. He believes that if the employees conduct themselves in a professional and forthright manner at all times there shouldn’t be a problem. Isn’t that the way it should be?
Mr. Ottinger said that only upon hearing the allegations did the school district seek legal counsel for input. After being advised that nothing could or should be done, the district ended it’s investigation. And that’s as it should be. To drag something on just because other people have their feathers in a ruff is not good business and not good for the students. If the parents and town busybodies can’t let it go, then it’s their fault when the kids have problems with it.
I do take issue with part of Mr. Ottinger’s statement, however. He says:
I certainly understand that people make mistakes, and when given the opportunity many people learn from their mistakes and actually become better people for having gone through that type of experience. While we want to teach our students about forgiveness, we also want them to understand that certain behavior is still considered by many to be unacceptable. Notwithstanding that point, it has been made clear to me that most of our parents do not want their children involved in any type of negative behavior they feel might have a detrimental impact on their children’s futures. So there really is a fine line between forgiveness and accountability, and both are important life lessons.
Make mistakes? Who said she made a mistake? And who is he to judge whether her previous life choices were wrong or not?
I can agree with keeping kids from “unacceptable behavior,” but let’s remember that there are many teachers and other school employees across this country who are either alleged to have had or convicted of illicit activities with their students! Shouldn’t we be more concerned about keeping the children away from them? Those are the people that can actually hurt them, not some static photo or video on a website an elementary child shouldn’t be viewing anyway. That’s the parents’ responsibility to keep the kids away from porn! It’s only the school’s responsibility during school hours.
And for the parents who “do not want their children involved in any type of negative behavior” — get a life! If you’re going to shelter your children so much that they never, ever hear a foul word or see a questionable photo, then don’t expect the rest of society to pick up after your mess when your kids can’t deal with the real world.
There are reports all over the news about “helicopter parents” who just can’t let go and expect “Billy” and “Susie” to get top grades, the best teachers, and no responsibilities just because they whine about it (the parents, that is, not the kids). These are the types of parents that have children who can’t function the first time someone reprimands them at their first job when they do something outrageously unsafe. These are the parents who have children who can’t pass a class in college and the instructors are sick to death of hearing their students ask if mom or dad can call to negotiate a higher grade.
A little self-responsibility is what people need. And if you have children too young to be responsible for themselves, remember that they are your children. They don’t belong to the school district, church, civic group, or any other agency you want to pawn off your responsibilities to raise your kids.
“Forgiveness and accountability are both important life lessons,” to paraphrase Mr. Ottinger. Let’s all be more forgiving after we’ve taken responsibility for our own families and lives.